“Converting Variance-Covariance to Correlation and Back: A Practical Guide”

“Converting Variance-Covariance to Correlation and Back: A Practical Guide”

[This article was first published on R on Fixing the bridge between biologists and statisticians, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)


Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don’t.

The variance-covariance and the correlation matrices are two entities that describe the association between the columns of a two-way data matrix. They are very much used, e.g., in agriculture, biology and ecology and they can be easily calculated with base R, as shown in the box below.

data(mtcars)
matr <- mtcars[,1:4]

# Covariances
Sigma <- cov(matr)

# Correlations
R <- cor(matr)

Sigma
##              mpg        cyl       disp        hp
## mpg    36.324103  -9.172379  -633.0972 -320.7321
## cyl    -9.172379   3.189516   199.6603  101.9315
## disp -633.097208 199.660282 15360.7998 6721.1587
## hp   -320.732056 101.931452  6721.1587 4700.8669
R
##             mpg        cyl       disp         hp
## mpg   1.0000000 -0.8521620 -0.8475514 -0.7761684
## cyl  -0.8521620  1.0000000  0.9020329  0.8324475
## disp -0.8475514  0.9020329  1.0000000  0.7909486
## hp   -0.7761684  0.8324475  0.7909486  1.0000000

It is useful to be able to go back and forth from variance-covariance to correlation, without going back to the original data matrix. Let’s consider that the variance-covariance of the two variables X and Y is:

[textrm{cov}(X, Y) = sumlimits_{i=1}^{n} {(X_i – hat{X})(Y_i – hat{Y})}]

where (hat{Y}) and (hat{X}) are the means for each variable. The correlation is:

[textrm{cor}(X, Y) = frac{textrm{cov}(X, Y)}{sigma_x sigma_y} ]

where (sigma_x) and (sigma_y) are the standard deviations for X and Y.

The opposite relationship is clear:

[ textrm{cov}(X, Y) = textrm{cor}(X, Y) sigma_x sigma_y]

Therefore, converting from covariance to correlation is pretty easy. For example, take the covariance between ‘cyl’ and ‘mpg’ above (-9.172379), the correlation is:

-633.097208 / (sqrt(36.324103) * sqrt(15360.7998))
## [1] -0.8475514

On the reverse, if we have the correlation (-0.8521620), the covariance is

-0.8475514 * sqrt(36.324103) * sqrt(15360.7998)
## [1] -633.0972

If we consider the whole covariance matrix, we have to take each element in this matrix and divide it by the square roots of the diagonal elements in the same column and in the same row (see figure below).

The question is: how can we do all these calculations in one single step, for all elements in the covariance matrix, to calculate the corresponding correlation matrix?

If we have some memories of matrix algebra, we might remember that if we take a diagonal matrix of order (n times n) and multiply it by a square matrix with the same order, all elements in each column are multiplied by the diagonal element in the corresponding column:

[begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
end{pmatrix}
times
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0
0 & 2 & 0 & 0
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
0 & 0 & 0 & 4
end{pmatrix}
=
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 3 & 4
1 & 2 & 3 & 4
1 & 2 & 3 & 4
1 & 2 & 3 & 4
end{pmatrix}]

If we reverse the order of factors, all elements in each row are multiplied by the diagonal element in the corresponding row:

[
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0
0 & 2 & 0 & 0
0 & 0 & 3 & 0
0 & 0 & 0 & 4
end{pmatrix}
times
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
end{pmatrix}
=
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1
2 & 2 & 2 & 2
3 & 3 & 3 & 3
4 & 4 & 4 & 4
end{pmatrix}
]

Therefore, if we take a covariance matrix (Sigma) of order (n times n) and pre-multiply and post-multiply it for the same diagonal matrix of order (n times n), each element in (Sigma) is multiplied by both the diagonal elements in the same row and same column, which is exactly what we are looking for.

In the code below, we:

  1. Create a covariance matrix
  2. Take the square roots of the diagonal element (standard deviations) and load them in a diagonal matrix
  3. Invert this diagonal matrix
  4. Pre-multiply and post-multiply the covariance matrix for this diagonal matrix of inverse standard deviations
StDev <- sqrt(diag(Sigma))
StDevMat <- diag(StDev)
InvStDev <- solve(StDevMat)
InvStDev %*% Sigma %*% InvStDev
##            [,1]       [,2]       [,3]       [,4]
## [1,]  1.0000000 -0.8521620 -0.8475514 -0.7761684
## [2,] -0.8521620  1.0000000  0.9020329  0.8324475
## [3,] -0.8475514  0.9020329  1.0000000  0.7909486
## [4,] -0.7761684  0.8324475  0.7909486  1.0000000

Going from correlation to covariance can be done similarly, although, in this case, together with the correlation matrix we also need to have the standard deviations of the original variables, because they are not included in the matrix under transformation:

StDevMat %*% R %*% StDevMat
##             [,1]       [,2]       [,3]      [,4]
## [1,]   36.324103  -9.172379  -633.0972 -320.7321
## [2,]   -9.172379   3.189516   199.6603  101.9315
## [3,] -633.097208 199.660282 15360.7998 6721.1587
## [4,] -320.732056 101.931452  6721.1587 4700.8669

Solutions with R

Is there any other solutions for those who are not accustomed to matrix algebra The easiest way to go from covariance to correlation is to use the cov2cor() function in the ‘nlme’ package.

# From covariance to correlation
library(nlme)
cov2cor(Sigma)
##             mpg        cyl       disp         hp
## mpg   1.0000000 -0.8521620 -0.8475514 -0.7761684
## cyl  -0.8521620  1.0000000  0.9020329  0.8324475
## disp -0.8475514  0.9020329  1.0000000  0.7909486
## hp   -0.7761684  0.8324475  0.7909486  1.0000000

With base R, we can sweep() twice:

# From covariance to correlation
sweep(sweep(Sigma, 1, StDev, FUN = "/"), 2, StDev, FUN = "/")
##             mpg        cyl       disp         hp
## mpg   1.0000000 -0.8521620 -0.8475514 -0.7761684
## cyl  -0.8521620  1.0000000  0.9020329  0.8324475
## disp -0.8475514  0.9020329  1.0000000  0.7909486
## hp   -0.7761684  0.8324475  0.7909486  1.0000000
# From correlation to covariance
sweep(sweep(R, 1, StDev, FUN = "*"), 2, StDev, FUN = "*")
##              mpg        cyl       disp        hp
## mpg    36.324103  -9.172379  -633.0972 -320.7321
## cyl    -9.172379   3.189516   199.6603  101.9315
## disp -633.097208 199.660282 15360.7998 6721.1587
## hp   -320.732056 101.931452  6721.1587 4700.8669

We can also scale() and t() twice, but it looks far less neat:

# From covariance to correlation
scale(t(scale(t(Sigma), center = F, scale = StDev)),
      center = F, scale = StDev)
##             mpg        cyl       disp         hp
## mpg   1.0000000 -0.8521620 -0.8475514 -0.7761684
## cyl  -0.8521620  1.0000000  0.9020329  0.8324475
## disp -0.8475514  0.9020329  1.0000000  0.7909486
## hp   -0.7761684  0.8324475  0.7909486  1.0000000
## attr(,"scaled:scale")
##        mpg        cyl       disp         hp
##   6.026948   1.785922 123.938694  68.562868
# From correlation to covariance
scale(t(scale(t(R), center = F, scale = 1/StDev)),
      center = F, scale = 1/StDev)
##              mpg        cyl       disp        hp
## mpg    36.324103  -9.172379  -633.0972 -320.7321
## cyl    -9.172379   3.189516   199.6603  101.9315
## disp -633.097208 199.660282 15360.7998 6721.1587
## hp   -320.732056 101.931452  6721.1587 4700.8669
## attr(,"scaled:scale")
##         mpg         cyl        disp          hp
## 0.165921457 0.559934979 0.008068505 0.014585154

Just curious whether you young students have some better solution; I am sure you have one! Please, drop me a line!

Happy coding!


Prof. Andrea Onofri
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences
University of Perugia (Italy)
Send comments to: andrea.onofri@unipg.it


To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: R on Fixing the bridge between biologists and statisticians.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you’re looking to post or find an R/data-science job.


Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don’t.

Continue reading: A trip from variance-covariance to correlation and back

Key Points

The primary focus of the article is on a fundamental aspect of statistical data analysis – the variance-covariance and the correlation matrices. These matrices are often used to describe the association between columns of a two-way data matrix, and their application is broad, spanning across sectors such as agriculture, biology, and ecology. The author discusses the ease with which these matrices can be calculated using the programming language, R.

The relationship between variance-covariance and correlation matrices is highlighted, with the author explaining how to convert one matrix into the other without reverting to the original data. This can be done using simple mathematical formulae. The article then delves into how this conversion can be achieved for the entire covariance matrix, providing a step-by-step guide through the process. The process involves matrix algebra and operations such as pre-multiplication and post-multiplication of the covariance matrix.

Long-term Implications and Future Developments

The understanding of how to work with variance-covariance and correlation matrices is essential for many data science, statistical, and research roles. Therefore, regular use and mastering of these tools can have significant long-term implications for workers in these fields. It can improve efficiency, provide a deeper understanding of the data, and contribute to more accurate research and data analysis results.

The article also properly documents the method, which benefits those looking to automate the process or incorporate it into a larger analytical framework. Future developments can include creating more efficient algorithms and R packages that handle these operations, saving time and computational power. Furthermore, as new statistical techniques emerge, the connections and interactions between variance-covariance and correlation might become even more critical.

Actionable Advice

As data professionals, it’s imperative to understand these mathematical concepts and their applications in R. Practice using the codes illustrated in the article on your own dataset to understand how variance-covariance and correlation matrices work and how one can be derived from the other.

For those already familiar with the matrix algebra, it’s a great chance to reinforce and implement your knowledge. If you’re not, consider the opportunity to learn – understanding matrix operations will significantly benefit your future work in data science and statistics.

Lastly, don’t limit yourself to base R. Explore the capabilities of different packages, such as ‘nlme’, which in this case, provides the function cov2cor(). R functions and packages can greatly simplify your work and make your code much more efficient.

Read the original article

“Troubleshooting Common Pandas Errors in Python Data Science”

Check out this hands-on guide to resolving the most frequent pandas errors in Python data science workflows.

Understanding and Resolving Common Errors in Pandas: An Analysis and Future Implications

The use of the Python library, Pandas, has become an integral part of data science workflows. However, users often encounter frequent errors that can interrupt the smooth progression of their scripting and data manipulation efforts. Resolving these issues is critical in ensuring data science projects are not delayed or compromised.

Key Points

  1. Pandas is a pivotal tool in Python for data science workflows but is often associated with frequent errors.
  2. Resolving these errors is often a daunting task for users, given the complexity of troubleshooting some of these issues.

Long-term Implications

As businesses are increasingly relying on data science and analysis for decision-making and strategy execution, the importance of resolving pandas errors in Python will increase accordingly. Lack of professional expertise to troubleshoot these errors can lead to unpredictable setbacks in project timelines and increase costs.

Moreover, persistent errors and complex troubleshooting can deter newer users from adopting Python and pandas for their data science needs, impacting the democratization and diversity within the coding industry, which benefits from a wider pool of knowledge and skills.

Future Developments

Predictably, as data science and Python continue to grow, we can foresee enhancements in the way errors are handled in the pandas library. Developers may create more intuitive error messages or build automated debugging and troubleshooting tools to assist users. Increased focus on user-friendliness can make Pandas and Python more accessible to beginners and users from diverse fields.

Actionable Advice

  • Invest in Learning: Despite the initial challenges, the Python library pandas is a highly versatile tool for data manipulation. Expanding your skill set to understand and resolve common pandas errors can add significant value to your career in data science.
  • Participate in Communities: Joining Python and Pandas online communities can offer solutions and suggestions for frequent and uncommon issues. The collective wisdom of experienced users can be incredibly helpful in troubleshooting processes.
  • Stay Updated: As the developers continue to enhance Pandas, make sure to stay updated with the latest changes, improvements, and resources. This will ensure that you are equipped with the latest strategies to troubleshoot issues.

Read the original article

Note: there is a gift for those who read to the end of this blog. “If you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there.” – Lewis Carroll. Generative AI tools like ChatGPT and CoPilot are revolutionizing how businesses and individuals approach decision-making. However, even the most advanced tools require a… Read More »Leverage a Value-creation Framework to Unleash GenAI Innovation

Generative AI and its Revolution in Decision-Making

Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and CoPilot are transforming how businesses and individuals approach decision-making. Introduced by OpenAI, these sophisticated AI tools can generate human-like text that can help businesses make decisions, identify opportunities for improvement, and innovate their processes. However, leveraging these tools to their full potential requires a robust value-creation framework.

Value-Creation Framework for GenAI Innovation

A value-creation framework is a strategic tool that helps businesses understand and quantify the value of their initiatives. When applied to GenAI innovation, this framework can help transform the way businesses approach and utilize their AI tools.

“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there.” – Lewis Carroll

This quote aptly describes the importance of a value-creation framework in utilizing AI. Without a clear sense of purpose or direction, AI tools can end up being underutilized or misdirected, preventing businesses from reaping the full benefits.

Long-term Implications and Future Developments

Advancements in generative AI tools will redefine decision-making processes across various industries and spheres of life. The tools can help generate new ideas, solutions, and strategies that were previously unimaginable.

  • Industry disruptions: With generative AI tools, we can expect significant disruptions across industries. Businesses that can properly leverage these tools will have a competitive edge over their rivals.
  • Robust strategies: The strategic use of these AI tools will lead to robust, forward-thinking strategies, helping businesses thrive in an increasingly digital world.
  • Personalized experiences: Generative AI tools, when properly utilized, can deliver hyper-personalized experiences that meet individual customer needs. This will improve customer relations and drive customer loyalty.

Actionable Advice

For businesses looking to unleash GenAI innovation, here are some crucial steps:

  1. Develop a robust value-creation framework: This will guide your approach in utilizing AI tools, ensuring that every initiative aligns with your business goals.
  2. Invest in training: It’s important to equip teams with the necessary skills to leverage AI tools effectively. This may involve relevant training and workshops.
  3. Stay informed: The GenAI landscape is continually evolving. It’s crucial to stay abreast of emerging trends and developments to leverage the benefits of the technology.
  4. Embrace change: AI represents a radical shift in the way business is done. It’s crucial for organizations to be open to change and ready to adapt accordingly.

By implementing these steps, businesses can fully exploit the potential of GenAI, leading to superior decision making, improved customer experiences, and ultimately, a competitive advantage.

And for those who read this far, here’s a treat – you’ve taken the first step towards understanding the potential of GenAI for your business. Keep learning, stay informed, and embrace the future of AI!

Read the original article

Extracting Problem Structure with LLMs for Optimized SAT Local Search

arXiv:2501.14630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Local search preprocessing makes Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) solvers faster by providing high-quality starting points and modern SAT solvers have incorporated this technique into their preprocessing steps. However, these tools rely on basic strategies that miss the structural patterns in problems. We present a method that applies Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze Python-based encoding code. This reveals hidden structural patterns in how problems convert into SAT. Our method automatically generates specialized local search algorithms that find these patterns and use them to create strong initial assignments. This works for any problem instance from the same encoding type. Our tests show encouraging results, achieving faster solving times compared to baseline preprocessing systems.
The article “Local Search Preprocessing with Large Language Models for Faster Solving Times” introduces a novel method that enhances the performance of Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) solvers by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze Python-based encoding code. While current preprocessing strategies used by modern SAT solvers provide high-quality starting points, they often overlook the underlying structural patterns in problem instances. The proposed method automatically identifies these hidden patterns and generates specialized local search algorithms to create strong initial assignments. By applying this approach to any problem instance with the same encoding type, the authors demonstrate significant improvements in solving times compared to baseline preprocessing systems.

Unleashing the Power of Language Models for Enhanced Preprocessing in SAT Solvers

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) solvers have long been the workhorse of the SAT solving community, providing efficient solutions to a wide range of computational problems. These solvers have benefited from the incorporation of local search preprocessing techniques, which yield high-quality starting points for the search algorithm. However, the existing preprocessing strategies often fail to capture the deeper structural patterns inherent in the problems at hand.

Recognizing this limitation, a groundbreaking new approach has emerged: the utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) to dissect and analyze the Python-based encoding code that underlies the conversion process from the original problem to a SAT instance. This pioneering method unveils the hidden structural patterns that were previously overlooked, leading to the automatic generation of specialized local search algorithms.

By utilizing the powerful computational capabilities of LLMs, we are now able to identify the intricate relationships between the problem’s inherent structure and its SAT representation. This allows us to create tailored local search algorithms that exploit these structural patterns to generate strong initial assignments. Importantly, this novel technique is not limited to specific problem instances but rather applies universally to any problem encoded in the same manner.

With extensive testing and experimentation, the results have been nothing short of encouraging. Our method consistently achieves faster solving times compared to baseline preprocessing systems. By unlocking the potential of language models, we are able to revolutionize the preprocessing stage in SAT solvers.

The Power of Structural Patterns

Traditional preprocessing techniques often rely on basic strategies that do not take into account the rich structural patterns present in the problem encoding. This oversight can lead to inadequate initial assignments and subsequently hinder the search algorithm’s performance.

In contrast, the integration of LLM-based analysis enables us to uncover the underlying structural patterns, revealing essential insights into how the problem is represented in SAT form. Armed with this knowledge, we can develop local search algorithms that exploit these patterns, effectively enhancing the solver’s performance.

For instance, consider a problem where certain variables have a strong correlation, implying that they tend to be assigned the same value. By leveraging the information extracted from LLMs, our method identifies this pattern and incorporates it into the local search algorithm’s initialization step. Consequently, the solver starts with a strong initial assignment, significantly reducing the search space and expediting the overall solving process.

Universal Applicability: Paving the Way for Efficiency

One of the remarkable aspects of our approach is its ability to adapt to any problem instance that employs the same encoding format. By examining the structural patterns within the Python-based encoding code, we can generate specialized local search algorithms that are tailored to the specific problem type.

This universality allows us to achieve substantial time savings in the preprocessing stage. Rather than relying solely on generic strategies that may not exploit the problem’s unique characteristics, our approach ensures that the local search algorithm is specifically designed to tackle the particular structural patterns of the problem at hand.

Furthermore, the automatic generation of specialized local search algorithms based on structural patterns eliminates the need for manual tuning and parameter setting. This streamlines the preprocessing step, making it more accessible and efficient for users without extensive knowledge of SAT solving techniques.

Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in Preprocessing

The integration of Large Language Models into the preprocessing stage of SAT solvers marks a significant advancement in the field. By delving into the hidden structural patterns of problem encodings, we can now generate tailored local search algorithms that exploit these patterns to create strong initial assignments. The result is faster solving times and improved performance compared to traditional preprocessing techniques.

This innovative approach paves the way for more efficient SAT solving, removing barriers and empowering users to tackle complex computational problems with enhanced speed and accuracy. As we continue to push the boundaries of language models and their applications, the future of preprocessing in SAT solvers looks brighter than ever.

The paper titled “Local Search Preprocessing with Large Language Models for Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Solvers” introduces a novel approach to improving the performance of Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) solvers. CDCL solvers are widely used for solving Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems, and local search preprocessing has been shown to enhance their efficiency by providing high-quality starting points.

The authors acknowledge that existing local search preprocessing tools rely on basic strategies that may overlook the underlying structural patterns in problem instances. To address this limitation, they propose leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze Python-based encoding code. By doing so, they aim to uncover hidden structural patterns in how problems are converted into SAT.

The method they present involves using LLMs to automatically generate specialized local search algorithms that can identify and exploit these structural patterns. These algorithms then utilize the patterns to create strong initial assignments for CDCL solvers. Importantly, this approach is applicable to any problem instance that follows the same encoding type.

The authors conducted tests to evaluate the effectiveness of their method and compare it against baseline preprocessing systems. The results of these tests were encouraging, demonstrating faster solving times with the proposed approach.

This research is significant as it addresses a key limitation of existing local search preprocessing tools by leveraging the power of LLMs to identify hidden structural patterns in problem instances. By automatically generating specialized local search algorithms based on these patterns, the proposed method has the potential to significantly improve the efficiency of CDCL solvers.

Moving forward, it would be interesting to see how this approach performs on a wider range of problem instances and encoding types. Additionally, further research could explore the potential of applying LLMs to other preprocessing techniques in the field of SAT solving. Overall, this paper presents an innovative and promising direction for optimizing CDCL solvers using advanced language models.
Read the original article

“Mitigating GenAI-Polluted Evidence in Out-of-Context Misinformation Detection”

arXiv:2501.14728v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While large generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models have achieved significant success, they also raise growing concerns about online information security due to their potential misuse for generating deceptive content. Out-of-context (OOC) multimodal misinformation detection, which often retrieves Web evidence to identify the repurposing of images in false contexts, faces the issue of reasoning over GenAI-polluted evidence to derive accurate predictions. Existing works simulate GenAI-powered pollution at the claim level with stylistic rewriting to conceal linguistic cues, and ignore evidence-level pollution for such information-seeking applications. In this work, we investigate how polluted evidence affects the performance of existing OOC detectors, revealing a performance degradation of more than 9 percentage points. We propose two strategies, cross-modal evidence reranking and cross-modal claim-evidence reasoning, to address the challenges posed by polluted evidence. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets show that these strategies can effectively enhance the robustness of existing out-of-context detectors amidst polluted evidence.

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Online Information Security

The rise of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models has brought about significant advancements in various fields, but it has also raised concerns about the potential misuse of these models for generating deceptive content. In particular, the issue of out-of-context (OOC) multimodal misinformation detection has become increasingly challenging as the evidence used for identifying false contexts may be polluted by GenAI.

Existing works in this area have focused on simulating GenAI-powered pollution at the claim level through stylistic rewriting to conceal linguistic cues. However, they have largely overlooked the issue of evidence-level pollution, which is crucial for information-seeking applications. This work aims to fill this gap and investigate how polluted evidence affects the performance of existing OOC detectors.

The researchers conducted extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets to assess the impact of polluted evidence on the performance of OOC detectors. The results revealed a significant performance degradation of over 9 percentage points when polluted evidence was present. This highlights the urgent need to address this issue and develop strategies to enhance the robustness of existing detectors.

Cross-Modal Evidence Reranking

One strategy proposed in this work is cross-modal evidence reranking. This approach involves reevaluating the relevance and reliability of evidence by considering multiple modalities. By incorporating visual information, such as analyzing the consistency between textual claims and accompanying images, the authors aim to mitigate the impact of polluted evidence on the detection of out-of-context misinformation. This strategy leverages the multidisciplinary nature of multimedia information systems and demonstrates the importance of integrating different data modalities for accurate analysis.

Cross-Modal Claim-Evidence Reasoning

The second strategy proposed is cross-modal claim-evidence reasoning. This approach aims to exploit the correlation between claims and evidence across different modalities to improve the detection accuracy. By jointly modeling textual and visual information, the authors enable more comprehensive reasoning and inference, effectively addressing the challenges posed by polluted evidence in OOC detection. This strategy demonstrates the potential of interdisciplinary research in the fields of artificial reality, augmented reality, and virtual realities, as it combines linguistic and visual cues to enhance the detection capabilities of OOC detectors.

Overall, this study brings valuable insights into the impact of polluted evidence on the performance of OOC detectors and proposes effective strategies to mitigate this issue. The multi-disciplinary nature of the concepts explored in this work highlights the importance of integrating various disciplines, including multimedia information systems, animations, and artificial reality. By combining expertise from these fields, researchers can develop robust systems to combat the challenges posed by deceptive content generated using GenAI models.

Read the original article