The US is against the world on sustainable development

Published online: 08 April 2025
Nature, doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01041-y

For years, sustainable development has been a global objective, with countries around the world working towards implementing environmentally-friendly practices and policies to ensure a better future. However, in recent times, the United States seems to be going against the tide, as it takes a stance that is in opposition to sustainable development efforts.

Key Points

  • The United States has been vocal about its skepticism towards climate change and environmental concerns, leading to a lack of support for global sustainability initiatives.
  • The US has withdrawn from key international climate agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, which aimed to limit global warming and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Domestically, the US government has rolled back environmental regulations and promoted the expansion of industries with high carbon footprints, such as coal and oil.
  • While some states and cities within the US have been proactive in taking sustainable actions, the overall national stance is hindering progress.

The Future Trends: Potential Scenarios

The US’s opposition to sustainable development raises significant concerns about the future of global environmental efforts. Several potential future scenarios could emerge in light of this situation:

  1. Isolation and Resistance: The US may face increasing isolation on the international stage, as other countries push forward with sustainable development initiatives. This could lead to trade barriers, strained diplomatic relationships, and limited cooperation on global challenges.
  2. Rise of Alternative Leadership: In the absence of US leadership on sustainability, other countries and regions may step up to take the lead. The European Union, China, and India have already shown commitment to sustainable development, and they could strengthen their positions as global leaders in this area.
  3. Technological Innovation: Without government support, sustainable innovation in the US might shift from the public to the private sector. Companies and entrepreneurs could take the lead in developing clean technologies, renewable energy, and sustainable practices, potentially driving a wave of innovation.
  4. Local and State Initiatives: As the national government neglects sustainable development, individuals, communities, and local governments may take matters into their own hands. Grassroots movements, advocacy organizations, and state-level sustainability initiatives could gain prominence, pushing for change from the bottom up.

Predictions and Recommendations

Despite the challenging reality presented by the US’s opposition to sustainable development, there are still predictions and recommendations worth considering:

  1. Increased Collaboration: Other countries should intensify collaboration amongst themselves, bypassing the US as needed, to strengthen global sustainability efforts. Joint research initiatives, funding mechanisms, and sharing best practices can help maintain momentum and progress.
  2. Engagement with the Private Sector: Governments, organizations, and investors worldwide should engage with US businesses and entrepreneurs who are committed to sustainable practices. By supporting and collaborating with these companies, the international community can promote sustainable innovation and foster change from within the US.
  3. Educational and Awareness Campaigns: Raising global awareness about the importance of sustainability is crucial for driving change. Governments, NGOs, and educational institutions should invest in campaigns to educate citizens and highlight the benefits and urgency of sustainable development. By fostering a global environmentally-conscious mindset, the international community can create a demand for sustainable solutions.
  4. Support for Local Initiatives: Individual efforts and local sustainability initiatives should be encouraged and supported. Governments and organizations can provide resources, funding, and incentives to local communities, enabling them to implement sustainable practices and set examples for others to follow.

Reference: Nature. (2025, April 8). The US is against the world on sustainable development. doi:10.1038/d41586-025-01041-y