arXiv:2504.18572v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing, yet their decision-making processes often lack transparency. This opaqueness raises significant concerns regarding trust, bias, and model performance. To address these issues, understanding and evaluating the interpretability of LLMs is crucial. This paper introduces a standardised benchmarking technique, Benchmarking the Explainability of Large Language Models, designed to evaluate the explainability of large language models.
Introduction
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing with their impressive capabilities. They are capable of understanding, generating, and translating text with remarkable accuracy. However, the lack of transparency in their decision-making processes raises concerns about trust, bias, and model performance. To address these issues, it is crucial to understand and evaluate the interpretability of LLMs.
Importance of Explainability
Explainability refers to the ability to understand and interpret the decision-making process of a machine learning model. As LLMs are deployed in various real-world applications, such as chatbots, customer service, and content generation, it becomes essential to ensure transparency and accountability.
One major concern with LLMs is the potential bias present in their outputs. Without a clear understanding of how these models arrive at their decisions, it becomes challenging to identify and rectify any biases that may exist. Additionally, the ability to explain model decisions helps in building trust and acceptance among users and stakeholders.
Benchmarking the Explainability of LLMs
This paper introduces a standardized benchmarking technique called Benchmarking the Explainability of Large Language Models. This technique aims to evaluate the explainability of LLMs and provide a common framework for comparing different models.
The benchmarking technique involves measuring the model’s ability to provide meaningful explanations for its decisions. This can be done through various methods, such as generating saliency maps that highlight important words or phrases in the input text, providing step-by-step reasoning for the output, or generating counterfactual explanations to understand how the model’s output would change with different inputs.
By benchmarking the explainability of LLMs, researchers and practitioners can gain insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different models and develop strategies to improve the interpretability of these models.
Multi-Disciplinary Nature of Explainability
The concept of explainability in LLMs is multi-disciplinary, involving expertise from various fields. Linguists and language experts can contribute insights into the quality of generated explanations and identify linguistic patterns that contribute to explainability.
From a machine learning perspective, researchers can develop techniques to extract and visualize important information from LLMs, making the decision-making process more interpretable. Additionally, experts in ethics and fairness can provide guidance on identifying and mitigating biases in LLMs.
The collaboration between these disciplines is crucial to achieving meaningful progress in evaluating and enhancing the explainability of LLMs.
The Future of Explainability in LLMs
As LLMs continue to evolve and become more powerful, the need for explainability becomes increasingly important. Future research in this field should focus on developing more sophisticated and comprehensive benchmarking techniques that cover a wide range of interpretability aspects.
Furthermore, efforts should be made to improve the transparency of LLMs by incorporating explainability as a core component during the model training process. This would enable models to provide meaningful explanations by default, increasing trust and reducing bias.
With advancements in explainability, LLMs have the potential to become more trustworthy and reliable in a wide range of real-world applications. However, it is essential to address the challenges associated with explainability to ensure that these models are accountable and fair.
Conclusion
The lack of transparency in the decision-making processes of Large Language Models raises concerns regarding trust, bias, and model performance. To address these concerns, it is crucial to evaluate and enhance the explainability of these models. The introduction of the standardized benchmarking technique, Benchmarking the Explainability of Large Language Models, provides a common framework for evaluating and comparing the explainability of LLMs. This multi-disciplinary effort involving linguists, machine learning researchers, and ethics experts is essential for advancing the field of explainability in LLMs. The future of LLMs lies in their ability to provide meaningful explanations, improving trust, and reducing bias.
Read the original article