[This article was first published on R | r4stats.com, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don’t.
I have just finished updating my reviews of graphical user interfaces for the R language. These include BlueSky Statistics, jamovi, JASP, R AnalyticFlow, R Commander, R-Instat, Rattle, and RKward. The permanent link to the article that summarizes it all is https://r4stats.com/articles/software-reviews/r-gui-comparison/. I list the highlights below as this post to reach all the blog aggregators. If you have suggestions for improving any of the reviews, please let me know at muenchen.bob@gmail.com.
With so many detailed reviews of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) for R available, which should you choose? It’s not too difficult to rank them based on the number of features they offer, so I’ll start there. Then, I’ll follow with a brief overview of each.
I’m basing the counts on the number of dialog boxes in each category of the following categories:
Ease of Use
General Usability
Graphics
Analytics
Reproducibility
This data is trickier to collect than you might think. Some software has fewer menu choices, depending on more detailed dialog boxes instead. Studying every menu and dialog box is very time-consuming, but that is what I’ve tried to do to keep this comparison trustworthy. Each development team has had a chance to look the data over and correct errors.
Perhaps the biggest flaw in this methodology is that every feature adds only one point to each GUI’s total score. I encourage you to download the full dataset to consider which features are most important to you. If you decide to make your own graphs with a different weighting system, I’d love to hear from you in the comments below.
Ease of Use
For ease of use, I’ve defined it primarily by how well each GUI meets its primary goal: avoiding code. They get one point for each of the following abilities, which include being able to install, start, and use the GUI to its maximum effect, including publication-quality output, without knowing anything about the R language itself. Figure one shows the result. R Commander is abbreviated Rcmdr, and R AnalyticFlow is abbreviated RAF. The commercial BlueSky Pro comes out on top by a slim margin, followed closely by JASP and RKWard. None of the GUIs achieved the highest possible score of 14, so there is room for improvement.
Installs without the use of R
Starts without the use of R
Remembers recent files
Hides R code by default
Use its full capability without using R
Data editor included
Pub-quality tables w/out R code steps
Simple menus that grow as needed
Table of Contents to ease navigation
Variable labels ease identification in the output
Easy to move blocks of output
Ease reading columns by freezing headers of long tables
Accepts data pasted from the clipboard
Easy to move header row of pasted data into the variable name field
Figure 1. The number of ease of use features offered by each R GUI.
General Usability
This category is dominated by data-wrangling capabilities, where data scientists and statisticians spend most of their time. It also includes various types of data input and output. We see in Figure 2 that both BlueSky versions and R-Instat come out on top not just due to their excellent selection of data-wrangling features but also for their use of the rio package for importing and exporting files. The rio package combines the import/export capabilities of many other packages, and it is easy to use. I expect the other GUIs will eventually adopt it, raising their scores by around 20 points.
Operating systems (how many)
Import data file types (how many)
Import from databases (how many)
Export data file types (how many)
Languages displayable in UI (how many, besides English)
Easy to repeat any step by groups (split-file)
Multiple data files open at once
Multiple output windows
Multiple code windows
Variable metadata view
Variable types (how many)
Variable search/filter in dialogs
Variable sort by name
Variable sort by type
Variable move manually
Model Builder (how many effect types)
Magnify GUI for teaching
R code editor
Comment/uncomment blocks of code
Package management (comes with R and all packages)
Output: word processing features
Output: R Markdown
Output: LaTeX
Data wrangling (how many)
Transform across many variables at once (e.g., row mean)
Transform down many variables at once (e.g., log, sqrt)
Assign factor labels across many variables at once
Project saves/loads data, dialogs, and notes in one file
Figure 2. The number of general usability features in each R GUI.
Graphics
This category consists mainly of the number of graphics each software offers. However, the other items can be very important to completing your work. They should add more than one point to the graphics score, but I scored them one point since some will view them as very important while others might not need them at all. Be sure to see the full reviews or download the Excel file if those features are important to you. Figure 3 shows the total graphics score for each GUI. R-Instat has a solid lead in this category. In fact, this underestimates R-Instat’s ability if you include its options to layer any “geom” on top of another graph. However, that requires knowing the geoms and how to use them. That’s knowledge of R code, of course.
When studying these graphs, it’s important to consider the difference between the relative and absolute performance. For example, relatively speaking, R Commander is not doing well here, but it does offer over 25 types of plots! That absolute figure might be fine for your needs.
An in-depth review of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) for the R language has been conducted, comparing key features of popular interfaces including BlueSky Statistics, jamovi, JASP, R AnalyticFlow, R Commander, R-Instat, Rattle, and RKward. The categories of Ease of Use, General Usability, Graphics, Analytics, and Reproducibility were considered as part of the comparative study. The GUIs were scored depending on how many features they offered in each category.
Implication and Future Developments
Improvements in Ease of Use and Functionality
First, it is clear that no GUI achieved the highest possible score in any category. This suggests that there is considerable room for improvement in all interfaces, especially in terms of ease of use. There is a need for R GUI developers to give more consideration to user-friendly features such as having simple menus that grow as needed, the easy movement of blocks of output, and the smooth importing of data from the clipboard.
Adoption of the Rio Package
Second, some GUIs like BlueSky and R-Instat were recognized for their use of the rio package for importing and exporting files. This convenience feature is expected to be eventually adopted by the other GUIs, potentially boosting their scores by about 20 points.
Graphics Capabilities
Third, there were significant differences in the graphics capabilities of the various GUIs. For example, R-Instat stood out due to its layering option, which could allow any graph to be placed on top of another. However, this feature requires knowledge of R code.
Actionable Advice
If you decide to use a GUI for R, firstly, consider the features that are most important to you. The robust review provided something of a consumer report, offering detailed insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each GUI.
Secondly, it is suggested that you keep an eye on GUIs that are making intensive use of the rio package. It seems that this feature is gaining prominence in the R community, and it is likely that user interfaces that adopt this package will gain in popularity and acceptance.
Finally, when it comes to graphics, it is important to not only look at the score but also understand what the score means in terms of the absolute performance of the GUI. For example, while a GUI can have a relatively low score, it might still offer the kind of graphics utility that satisfies your specific needs.
An in-depth understanding of your requirements from a GUI, keeping an eye on emerging trends, and a critical evaluation of GUI capabilities are key to making the right choice. Also, providing feedback to the GUI development teams can help in the evolution of these interfaces to better serve user needs.
arXiv:2409.15403v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In the present Master’s thesis, I describe the research I conducted during my Master’s program on the topic of analogue gravity. This line of research was initiated by Bill Unruh, who established an analogy between hydrodynamic flow with a supersonic region and black holes. One possibility to exploit this hydrodynamics/gravity analogy is to create analogue black holes within Bose-Einstein condensates. At low temperatures, phonons-low energy excitations-behave like a massless scalar field in an emergent acoustic metric determined by the condensate. An acoustic black hole is created by transonic fluid, and quantum fluctuations at the acoustic horizon lead to thermal radiation of phonons, akin to Hawking radiation. This emission has been numerically simulated and experimentally verified in Bose-Einstein condensates. The goal of my Master’s thesis is to design a system in which an acoustic horizon is excited by a gravitational wave-like perturbation. The thesis is divided into two main parts: the first reviews essential topics of general relativity, quantum field theory in curved spacetimes and analogue gravity; while the second presents my results. Firstly, I propose a method to reproduce a gravitational wave perturbation on a flat background acoustic metric emergent from a Bose-Einstein condensate. Secondly, I demonstrate how to implement an impinging gravitational wave-like perturbation at an acoustic horizon. I then analyze how the horizon responds to this analogue gravitational wave and discuss the implications of my work, including potential studies on shear viscosity and entropy density of the perturbed acoustic horizon. Notably, these interesting research directions could be explored in experiments conducted with ultra-cold quantum gas platforms.
Introduction:
This article discusses the research conducted during a Master’s program on the topic of analogue gravity. The author explores the analogy between hydrodynamic flow with a supersonic region and black holes, and proposes the creation of analogue black holes within Bose-Einstein condensates. The thesis is divided into two main parts, with the first reviewing essential topics and the second presenting the author’s results.
Challenges and Opportunities:
Challenges:
Reproducing a gravitational wave perturbation on a flat background acoustic metric from a Bose-Einstein condensate.
Implementing an impinging gravitational wave-like perturbation at an acoustic horizon.
Opportunities:
Studying shear viscosity and entropy density of the perturbed acoustic horizon.
Exploring interesting research directions in experiments with ultra-cold quantum gas platforms.
Roadmap:
Introduction: Overview of the research conducted on analogue gravity, hydrodynamic flow, and black holes.
Review of Essential Topics:
General relativity.
Quantum field theory in curved spacetimes.
Analogue gravity.
Results:
Method to reproduce a gravitational wave perturbation on a flat background acoustic metric.
Implementation of an impinging gravitational wave-like perturbation at an acoustic horizon.
Analysis of the horizon’s response to the analogue gravitational wave.
Discussion of implications, including potential studies on shear viscosity and entropy density.
Conclusion: Summary of the research conducted and the potential for further exploration in experiments with ultra-cold quantum gas platforms.
Conclusion:
The thesis presents research on the creation of analogue black holes within Bose-Einstein condensates by exploiting the analogy between hydrodynamic flow and black holes. The author proposes methods for reproducing gravitational wave perturbations and implementing them at acoustic horizons. The results open up opportunities for studying shear viscosity and entropy density of the perturbed horizon, as well as further experiments with ultra-cold quantum gas platforms. Read the original article
I’m sorry, but as an AI language model, I cannot browse the internet or access current articles. Therefore, I cannot provide you with an accurate analysis or write a detailed article with references on the potential future trends related to the themes mentioned in your text. However, if you can provide me with the specific key points or context from the text, I would be more than happy to help you with your article.
Potential Future Trends in Contemporary Art: Analyzing Nikita Gale’s Work
Nikita Gale, a Los Angeles-based artist, has recently been named the winner of the Whitney Museum’s Bucksbaum Award. Gale’s innovative installations, which blend unexpected elements like video and sound equipment with industrial materials, have garnered significant attention in the art world. This article will delve into the key points of Gale’s work and analyze potential future trends in the contemporary art industry.
Gale’s Unique Approach to Minimalism
In 2022, Gale’s work was showcased at 52 Walker Street, and the New York Times acknowledged her as part of a distinct group of women artists of color who are redefining the rules of minimalism. This recognition highlights the shifting landscape of art, with marginalized voices gaining prominence and challenging established norms.
In the future, we can expect more artists from diverse backgrounds to reshape and redefine traditional art movements. Their work will likely continue to address important societal issues and challenge existing power structures.
The Intersection of Music, Protest, and Physical Barriers
Gale’s installation titled “PROPOSAL: SOFT SURROUND SYSTEM” explored the roles of music and physical barriers in galvanizing protests and mass detainments. This intersection of art with sociopolitical issues suggests a potential future trend in contemporary art.
As political unrest and activism continue to shape our world, artists will likely explore themes related to social justice, human rights, and the power of collective action. Installations and multimedia artworks that shed light on these issues will become more prevalent in the future.
Challenging Audience Expectations
Gale’s installation “TEMPO RUBATO (STOLEN TIME)” for the 2024 Biennial challenged audience expectations by presenting a player piano that emitted no sound. The refusal to conform to viewer preferences reflects a growing trend among artists to resist oppressive structures.
In the coming years, we can anticipate more artists rejecting the pressures of the art market and mainstream expectations. By creating unconventional and thought-provoking works, artists will push boundaries and redefine the relationship between artwork and audience.
The Influence of Technology on the Body
Gale’s work explores the relationship between the body and technology, a theme that resonates with the increasingly digitized world we live in. As technology continues to shape our lives, artists will likely delve deeper into how it impacts our bodies, identities, and experiences.
We can expect future artworks to incorporate cutting-edge technologies, such as virtual reality and augmented reality, to create immersive and interactive experiences for viewers. These artworks will blur the line between physical and virtual realities, challenging our perceptions and expanding the possibilities of artistic expression.
Recommendations for the Industry
Based on the potential future trends discussed, here are some recommendations for the contemporary art industry:
Promote Diversity and Inclusion: Museums, galleries, and art institutions should actively seek out and support artists from diverse backgrounds. This will ensure a more inclusive and representative art scene that reflects the complexity of our society.
Foster Collaborations: Encouraging collaborations between artists, curators, and institutions can lead to the creation of innovative and compelling artworks. These collaborations can also facilitate knowledge sharing and create opportunities for emerging artists.
Embrace Technology: Integrating technology into artistic practices can open up new possibilities for creative expression and viewer engagement. Embracing virtual and augmented reality, interactive installations, and other emerging technologies will attract a wider audience and keep the art industry relevant in a digital age.
Continuously Challenge Boundaries: Artists should continue to challenge the boundaries of what is considered art, exploring unconventional mediums, formats, and subject matter. This will push the industry forward and spark meaningful conversations.
Conclusion
Nikita Gale’s groundbreaking work and recognition in the art world provide valuable insights into potential future trends. By embracing diversity, addressing social issues, challenging audience expectations, and incorporating technology, the contemporary art industry can move towards a more inclusive, thought-provoking, and dynamic future.
“Nikita Gale has an incredible knack for making work that is both conceptually rigorous and full of emotion, somehow disciplined and mysterious at the same time.” – Scott Rothkopf, Whitney Museum director
Today’s fast-paced mobile app development services ecosystem makes app reliability crucial. App crashes disrupt user experience, cost money, and get bad reviews. Even with automated testing tools, detecting crashes caused by unexpected user inputs is difficult. Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate many unusual text inputs to stress-test mobile apps.
Understanding the Implications of Mobile App Crashes and Role of Large Language Models
In the quicksilver world of mobile application development, app reliability is of extreme importance. Unplanned disruptions due to app crashes not only impair user experiences but also affect the economic viability of the app to a large extent, and to make things worse, create a negative public image via poor reviews.
The Drawback of Automated Testing Tools and the Introduction of LLMs
While the development ecosystem boasts of advanced automated testing tools, identifying crashes caused due to unanticipated user inputs still presents a significant challenge. On a promising note, innovative solutions like Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited potential in generating a plethora of unusual text inputs, thereby challenging the app beyond standard limits, culminating into a more rigorous stress-testing process.
Long-term implications and possible future developments
The Age of Effective Stress-Testing with LLMs
The introduction of LLMs in app testing could mark the advent of a more comprehensive and tougher evaluation process. Since these models can generate various unpredictable text inputs, they could identify potential crash-causers which a traditional automated tool may miss. Consequently, this can lead to the development of more robust and reliable mobile apps, which could enhance user experience and in turn, the app’s market reputation.
Economical Impact
Furthermore, LLMs could exhibit a significant influence on the cost-effectiveness of mobile applications. By discovering and resolving crashes in the testing phase itself, applications could save the expenses associated with post-launch patches and fixes. This could also mitigate losses stemming from negative user reviews and reduced app usage.
Actionable Advice
Adopting LLMs for Stress-Testing
Mobile app developers should leverage LLMs to generate diverse user inputs for testing purposes. Accommodating LLMs within the testing process can lead to the identification of previously overlooked faults, making room for advancements in app robustness and reliability.
Investing in Future Tech
Considering the potential of LLMs in app development, it is advisable for businesses to invest in this technology. As it could result in reducing costs in the long run and improving app reliability, the initial investment can be considered a strategic move towards improved customer satisfaction and economic efficiency.
Building Resilience through Regular Updates
Finally, to stay ahead of the curve, regular updates are key. With technologies rapidly evolving, keeping applications updated based on the ongoing trends and the latest tools available can ensure an app stays error-free, reliable, and popular among users.
