Expanding Horizons in HCI Research Through LLM-Driven Qualitative Analysis. (arXiv:2401.04138v1 [cs.HC])

In the ever-evolving world of research, new methodologies often spark controversy. In this article, we delve into the realm of qualitative analysis in HCI and introduce a groundbreaking approach using Large Language Models (LLMs). By utilizing LLMs for data analysis, we not only match the effectiveness of traditional methods but also uncover unique insights. Our findings, supported by a quantitative framework using SBART cosine similarity, shed light on the potential of LLMs in HCI research. Through a novel dataset and benchmark, we explore the characteristics of LLMs and propose exciting avenues for further exploration and application in the field.

How would research be like if we still needed to “send” papers typed with a typewriter? Our life and research environment have continually evolved, often accompanied by controversial opinions about new methodologies. In this article, we embrace this change by introducing a new approach to qualitative analysis in HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) using Large Language Models (LLMs) and propose innovative solutions and ideas for the field.

Embracing Change: Using LLMs for Qualitative Data Analysis

The field of Human-Computer Interaction seeks to understand the relationship between humans and technology, aiming to design and develop user-friendly interfaces and systems. Traditionally, qualitative data analysis in HCI involved manually categorizing and coding textual data, a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. However, with the advent of LLMs, we can revolutionize the way we analyze qualitative data and uncover unique insights.

Large Language Models, such as GPT-3, have gained significant attention for their ability to generate human-like text and comprehend vast amounts of information. While initially developed for tasks like language translation and text generation, we propose utilizing LLMs for qualitative data analysis in HCI.

Proposed Method: SBART Cosine Similarity

In this article, we present a quantitative framework using SBART cosine similarity for performance evaluation of LLMs in qualitative analysis. SBART, which stands for “Similarity-Based Analysis of Responses in Text,” allows us to compare the similarity between the textual responses of participants in a study.

The proposed method involves pre-training an LLM on a large corpus of HCI-related texts, enabling it to learn patterns and contextual understanding of the field. Then, during qualitative analysis, the LLM is used to analyze the textual data from participants and generate embeddings representing the meaning and context of their responses.

These embeddings are then compared using SBART cosine similarity, which measures the similarity between two vectors representing the meanings of textual responses. The higher the cosine similarity, the closer the meanings of the responses.

Revolutionizing HCI Research with LLMs

Our findings indicate that LLMs not only match the efficacy of traditional analysis methods but also offer unique insights. By leveraging the contextual understanding and vast knowledge of LLMs, we can uncover hidden patterns, identify crucial themes, and extract valuable information from qualitative data in HCI.

Moreover, LLMs enable researchers to scale their analysis by processing large amounts of textual data quickly and efficiently. This efficiency allows for deeper exploration and analysis of data, leading to more comprehensive research outcomes.

Potential Avenues for Exploration and Application

Through a novel dataset and benchmark created specifically for LLM-based analysis in HCI research, our study highlights potential avenues for further exploration and application of LLMs in the field.

One potential avenue is the integration of real-time LLM analysis in user studies. By leveraging the power of LLMs, researchers can gain immediate insights into user feedback, allowing for iterative design improvements and more agile development processes.

Additionally, LLMs can be utilized to bridge the gap between qualitative and quantitative analysis in HCI. By combining LLM-based qualitative analysis with traditional statistical analysis of quantitative data, researchers can obtain a more holistic understanding of the user experience.

Overall, LLMs have the potential to revolutionize qualitative analysis in HCI. By embracing this change and exploring innovative methods like SBART cosine similarity, we open doors to new insights and practices that can shape the future of HCI research. Let us embrace this technological advancement and unlock the full potential of LLMs in understanding and designing better human-computer interactions.

As an expert commentator, I find this paper to be a fascinating exploration of the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in qualitative analysis in HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) research. The authors have recognized the evolving nature of our research environment and have embraced the use of LLMs as a new approach to qualitative analysis.

One interesting aspect to consider is the contrast between the traditional method of sending typed papers with a typewriter and the use of LLMs in research. If we were still reliant on typewriters, the process of disseminating research findings would be significantly slower and less efficient. The ability to instantly share and access research papers online has transformed the way we conduct research and has greatly accelerated the pace of scientific progress. Additionally, the use of digital tools allows for easier collaboration and discussion among researchers, further enhancing the research process.

The authors’ use of LLMs for qualitative data analysis is a novel and innovative approach. LLMs have shown great promise in natural language processing tasks, and this paper demonstrates their potential in the field of HCI research. By leveraging the capabilities of LLMs, researchers can analyze qualitative data more efficiently and effectively. The paper introduces a quantitative framework using SBART cosine similarity for performance evaluation, which provides a standardized measure for assessing the efficacy of LLM-based analysis methods.

The findings presented in this paper are particularly noteworthy. The authors indicate that LLMs not only match the efficacy of traditional analysis methods but also offer unique insights. This suggests that LLMs have the potential to revolutionize qualitative analysis in HCI research by providing researchers with new perspectives and uncovering previously unseen patterns or trends in the data.

Furthermore, the authors highlight the importance of exploring LLMs’ characteristics in HCI research through a novel dataset and benchmark. This is a crucial step in understanding the strengths and limitations of LLM-based analysis methods and identifying potential areas for further exploration and application in the field. By establishing a benchmark, the research community can compare different LLM models and techniques, facilitating the development of more robust and reliable LLM-based analysis approaches.

In conclusion, this paper presents a compelling case for the use of LLMs in qualitative analysis in HCI research. The authors’ approach and findings demonstrate the potential of LLMs to enhance the research process by providing efficient and insightful analysis methods. Moving forward, it will be exciting to see how researchers further explore and apply LLMs in the field, potentially leading to new breakthroughs and advancements in HCI research.
Read the original article